data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/917bc/917bcb95289d81154d2e10328581c86313c67118" alt="Intel power gadget windows"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85ca/b85caeba9b66d856d4c7fa2e55c4bf19c98904eb" alt="intel power gadget windows intel power gadget windows"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64ff8/64ff838b7f61f1081746da2a6e928321d0ea2af7" alt="intel power gadget windows intel power gadget windows"
Passmark is the only benchmark we ran that still gave the nod to AMD's Ryzen 9 CPUs-and even there, AMD won only by a narrow margin. In addition to nearly doubling generation-on-generation performance from i9-11900K to i9-12900K, Intel beats the pants off the Ryzen 9 line in both Geekbench 5 and Cinebench R20 multithreaded tests. Advertisementįor the first time in several years, the story here isn't just whether or not Intel managed to one-up its own previous generation-Intel is actually beating AMD's best consumer CPU offerings, almost across the board. We tested Alder Lake on the latest Windows 11 below, but our Ryzen results are on Windows 10-this made certain to avoid AMD being penalized by the current Windows 11 regressions in 元 cache and Preferred Core selection, while giving Alder Lake the big.little architecture support it needs from Windows 11 itself. Unfortunately, Intel still requires a power premium to achieve those results despite its theoretically more efficient chip layout, Alder Lake consumes more power and runs hotter than Zen 3 does. And despite having the same number of cores and fewer overall threads, Intel for the first time in years beats AMD handily on almost all multithreaded benchmarks. The proof of the pudding, they say, is in the tasting-or in this case, the benchmarking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91489/9148941defe72375419cc6485dc4a1abb20c1314" alt="intel power gadget windows intel power gadget windows"
But there's still good reason for hybrid designs even on the desktop-die space remains sharply limited in CPUs, and you can fit more of the smaller "efficiency" cores into a given package size. By contrast, the i9-12900K offers 16 cores and only 24 threads-with eight "performance" cores featuring SMT and eight lower-performance "efficiency" cores with no SMT.Īlthough the world largely understands big.little design in mobile CPUs-where the value of having slow but efficient cores for non-latency-sensitive tasks means longer battery life and less waste heat-the value isn't as well-understood in desktop CPUs, where power and thermal budgets aren't such an obvious problem. AMD's flagship Ryzen 9 5950x is a traditional 16 core, 32 thread design, with all cores being "big" high-performance types with symmetric multithreading (SMT, also known as "hyperthreading"). We suspect this will be especially surprising to some, since Intel's newest desktop CPUs feature a hybrid " big.little" design similar to those found in ARM CPUs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0589/a0589dff4ec25dbba70822c65cc56f0e3d9ca1ad" alt="intel power gadget windows intel power gadget windows"
After spending several days with Intel's newest consumer CPU designs, we have some surprising news: they're faster than AMD's latest Ryzens on both single-threaded and most multithreaded benchmarks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/917bc/917bcb95289d81154d2e10328581c86313c67118" alt="Intel power gadget windows"